Index by author

The Four Year USSC & GAO Impact Reports

Vol. 5 No. 3, Nov. - Dec., 1992

A

  1. Alito, Samuel A.

    1. Reviewing the Sentencing Commission's 1991 Annual Report
      Samuel A. Alito
      Federal Sentencing Reporter Nov 1992, 5 (3) 166-183; DOI: 10.2307/20639538

B

  1. Banks, Dorann E.

    1. The Four Year Reports of the Sentencing Commission and the General Accounting Office: Some Observations
      Louis F. Oberdorfer, Dorann E. Banks
      Federal Sentencing Reporter Nov 1992, 5 (3) 158-161; DOI: 10.2307/20639535

  2. Bowman, Francesca D.

    1. The Gao and Sentencing Commission Impact Reports: Where's the Impact?
      Francesca D. Bowman
      Federal Sentencing Reporter Nov 1992, 5 (3) 164-165; DOI: 10.2307/20639537

  3. Broderick, Vincent L.

    1. Letters to GAO: Letters Sent to GAO Reviewing Report Draft
      William W. Wilkins,, Vincent L. Broderick
      Federal Sentencing Reporter Nov 1992, 5 (3) 139-143; DOI: 10.2307/20639530

C

  1. Cohn, Avern

    1. The General Accounting Office Report to Congressional Committees on Sentencing Guidelines—A Reaction
      Avern Cohn
      Federal Sentencing Reporter Nov 1992, 5 (3) 156-157; DOI: 10.2307/20639534

  2. Cole, Kevin

    1. The Dangers of Drawing Distinctions: Jury Involvement in Finding (Some) Sentencing Facts
      Kevin Cole
      Federal Sentencing Reporter Nov 1992, 5 (3) 177-178; DOI: 10.2307/20639541

M

  1. Mihm, Michael M.

    1. The Roles and Responsibilities of the Judiciary in the Implementation of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984
      Michael M. Mihm
      Federal Sentencing Reporter Nov 1992, 5 (3) 174-176; DOI: 10.2307/20639540

O

  1. Oberdorfer, Louis F.

    1. The Four Year Reports of the Sentencing Commission and the General Accounting Office: Some Observations
      Louis F. Oberdorfer, Dorann E. Banks
      Federal Sentencing Reporter Nov 1992, 5 (3) 158-161; DOI: 10.2307/20639535

R

  1. Rhodes, William

    1. Sentence Disparity, Use of Incarceration, and Plea Bargaining: The Post-Guideline View from the Commission
      William Rhodes
      Federal Sentencing Reporter Nov 1992, 5 (3) 153-155; DOI: 10.2307/20639533

S

  1. Schulhofer, Stephen J.

    1. Excessive Uniformity—And How to Fix It
      Stephen J. Schulhofer
      Federal Sentencing Reporter Nov 1992, 5 (3) 169-173; DOI: 10.2307/20639539

T

  1. Tonry, Michael

    1. GAO Report Confirms Failure of U.S. Guidelines
      Michael Tonry
      Federal Sentencing Reporter Nov 1992, 5 (3) 144-183; DOI: 10.2307/20639531

W

  1. Waldfogel, Joel

    1. Guest Editor's Observations: Narrow Questions, Overstated Answers
      Joel Waldfogel
      Federal Sentencing Reporter Nov 1992, 5 (3) 123-125; DOI: 10.2307/20639527

  2. Weil, Amy Levin

    1. A Critique of the Gao and Sentencing Commission Reports: Why the Central Questions Remain Unanswered
      Joe D. Whitley, Amy Levin Weil
      Federal Sentencing Reporter Nov 1992, 5 (3) 162-163; DOI: 10.2307/20639536

  3. Weisburd, David

    1. Sentencing Disparity and the Guidelines: Taking a Closer Look
      David Weisburd
      Federal Sentencing Reporter Nov 1992, 5 (3) 149-152; DOI: 10.2307/20639532

  4. White, Bryon

    1. Dissent from Denial of Certiorari
      Bryon White
      Federal Sentencing Reporter Nov 1992, 5 (3) 179-183; DOI: 10.2307/20639542

  5. Whitley, Joe D.

    1. A Critique of the Gao and Sentencing Commission Reports: Why the Central Questions Remain Unanswered
      Joe D. Whitley, Amy Levin Weil
      Federal Sentencing Reporter Nov 1992, 5 (3) 162-163; DOI: 10.2307/20639536

  6. Wilkins,, William W.

    1. Letters to GAO: Letters Sent to GAO Reviewing Report Draft
      William W. Wilkins,, Vincent L. Broderick
      Federal Sentencing Reporter Nov 1992, 5 (3) 139-143; DOI: 10.2307/20639530
Back to top

In this issue